Best Open Source Auth Solutions in 2026
Best Open Source Authentication Solutions in 2026
TL;DR
Auth0 charges $23+ per 1,000 MAU. At 10,000 users, you're paying $2,760/year for a service you could run on a $16/month VPS. Keycloak is the enterprise-grade standard for SSO, SAML, and LDAP federation. Authentik protects existing apps via reverse proxy without touching their code. Logto has the best developer experience for modern web apps. SuperTokens is the easiest drop-in for React/Node.js stacks.
Key Takeaways
- Keycloak (Apache-2.0, 23K+ stars) is the most widely deployed open source IAM platform, trusted by Red Hat, governments, and enterprises globally
- Authentik (MIT, 13K+ stars) can protect any existing app via reverse proxy without code changes — the fastest path to SSO for legacy services
- Logto (MPL-2.0, 9K+ stars) has 15+ SDKs and the cleanest sign-in UI builder for modern consumer-facing apps
- SuperTokens (Apache-2.0, 13K+ stars) provides pre-built React UI components and handles sessions securely by default
- Ory (Apache-2.0, 14K+ stars) is the cloud-native choice for microservice architectures that need identity as stateless services
- Self-hosting auth at 10K MAU saves $2,568/year vs Auth0; at 100K MAU the savings reach $27,216/year
The Hidden Cost of Identity-as-a-Service
Auth0 and Okta price on Monthly Active Users because that's what scales with your business. When you're at 100 MAU, the pricing seems negligible. When you hit 10,000 MAU or 100,000 MAU, the costs become a significant line item — and unlike infrastructure costs, they don't flatten as you scale.
The architectural lock-in is equally significant. Auth0's token format, user metadata schema, and action/rule system are proprietary. Teams that have deeply integrated Auth0 hooks into their authorization logic find migration to an alternative requires weeks of engineering work. Open source alternatives — especially those supporting OIDC and SAML standards — provide a clean exit path whenever you need it.
Keycloak — Enterprise SSO Standard
Keycloak is the reference implementation for enterprise identity management. It's been production-hardened over 10+ years, deployed by Red Hat (its creator), the European Union's identity infrastructure, NASA, and thousands of enterprises globally. If you need SAML federation, LDAP user sync, Kerberos integration, or fine-grained authorization policies, Keycloak is the tool.
The feature set is comprehensive: OIDC, OAuth 2.0, SAML 2.0, LDAP/AD sync, Kerberos, social login, custom authentication flows, user federation, admin REST API, and a custom theme system for white-labeling the login UI.
Authentication flows are Keycloak's most powerful feature. You can build multi-step authentication sequences: email/password → TOTP → IP address check → risk scoring → step-up authentication for sensitive operations. Each step is a "Authenticator" that can be mixed and matched in the admin console.
# Keycloak Docker Compose (with PostgreSQL)
services:
keycloak:
image: quay.io/keycloak/keycloak:latest
command: start-dev # Use 'start' for production
environment:
- KC_DB=postgres
- KC_DB_URL=jdbc:postgresql://db:5432/keycloak
- KC_DB_USERNAME=keycloak
- KC_DB_PASSWORD=password
- KEYCLOAK_ADMIN=admin
- KEYCLOAK_ADMIN_PASSWORD=change-me-in-production
- KC_HOSTNAME=auth.yourdomain.com
ports:
- "8080:8080"
depends_on:
- db
db:
image: postgres:15
environment:
POSTGRES_DB: keycloak
POSTGRES_USER: keycloak
POSTGRES_PASSWORD: password
volumes:
- keycloak_data:/var/lib/postgresql/data
volumes:
keycloak_data:
Keycloak's Java foundation has a cost: a production Keycloak instance with clustering needs 2–4 GB RAM per node. For small organizations with budget constraints, this is where Authentik or Logto are more appropriate.
Key features:
- OIDC, OAuth 2.0, SAML 2.0 support
- LDAP and Active Directory sync
- Kerberos integration
- Custom authentication flows
- User federation (import from external sources)
- Fine-grained authorization (policy-based)
- Social login (Google, GitHub, Microsoft, 50+ providers)
- Admin REST API
- Custom themes for login pages
- Multi-realm (multi-tenant) support
Authentik — Best for Protecting Existing Apps
Authentik's defining capability is its outpost/proxy provider architecture. You deploy an Authentik outpost alongside your applications, and it acts as a forward-auth middleware. When a user tries to access your internal tool, they're redirected to Authentik for authentication, then forwarded back. Your existing application code doesn't change.
This makes Authentik the fastest path to adding SSO to:
- Internal tools that have no auth (Grafana without LDAP, internal wikis, admin dashboards)
- Applications that support basic auth but not OIDC
- Legacy services that you can't easily modify
# Authentik with Nginx forward auth
services:
authentik-server:
image: ghcr.io/goauthentik/server:latest
command: server
environment:
- AUTHENTIK_REDIS__HOST=redis
- AUTHENTIK_POSTGRESQL__HOST=postgresql
- AUTHENTIK_POSTGRESQL__PASSWORD=password
- AUTHENTIK_SECRET_KEY=your-secret-key
- AUTHENTIK_ERROR_REPORTING__ENABLED=false
authentik-worker:
image: ghcr.io/goauthentik/server:latest
command: worker
environment:
- AUTHENTIK_REDIS__HOST=redis
- AUTHENTIK_POSTGRESQL__HOST=postgresql
- AUTHENTIK_POSTGRESQL__PASSWORD=password
- AUTHENTIK_SECRET_KEY=your-secret-key
Authentik also supports SCIM provisioning — automatically creating and deactivating user accounts in connected applications when employees join or leave. This is the feature IT teams care about most for employee lifecycle management.
Visual flow builder lets non-developers design authentication sequences through a drag-and-drop interface. Add MFA steps, conditional logic based on user groups, and custom branding without writing code.
Key features:
- Forward authentication proxy (protect apps without code changes)
- OIDC, SAML, LDAP provider support
- SCIM provisioning
- Visual flow builder for authentication sequences
- Application proxy (outpost)
- Passkeys/WebAuthn support
- Radius provider (for network authentication)
- Custom branding per application
Logto — Best Developer Experience
Logto is built specifically for developers building modern web and mobile applications. The focus shows: the documentation is excellent, the SDK selection covers 15+ frameworks, and the hosted sign-in experience is polished out of the box.
The sign-in UI is customizable through a UI editor without CSS skills required. You choose your logo, colors, and layout — Logto renders a pixel-perfect sign-in page. This is the feature Auth0 charges significantly for in their higher tiers.
Multi-tenancy is a first-class feature in Logto. If you're building a B2B SaaS where each customer is a separate "organization," Logto's organization concept maps directly to that model. Each organization can have its own SSO configuration, branding, and member management.
// Logto Next.js SDK
import LogtoClient from '@logto/next'
export const logtoClient = new LogtoClient({
appId: 'your-app-id',
appSecret: 'your-app-secret',
endpoint: 'https://auth.yourdomain.com',
baseUrl: 'https://yourapp.com',
cookieSecret: 'complex-secret-at-least-32-chars',
cookieSecure: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production',
})
Key features:
- 15+ official SDKs (Next.js, React, Vue, Express, Go, Python, etc.)
- Visual sign-in UI editor
- Multi-tenancy with organization concept
- Social login (30+ providers)
- Webhooks for user events
- Audit logs
- TypeScript-native API
SuperTokens — Easiest Drop-In Auth
SuperTokens differentiates by providing pre-built UI components for the most common authentication flows: email/password, social login, magic links, and passwordless. If your frontend is React, you import the SuperTokens React component library and get a complete auth UI in an afternoon.
The session management is particularly well designed. SuperTokens rotates refresh tokens on every use, short-lived access tokens (1 hour), and handles token theft detection with automatic session revocation. These security properties are correct by default without requiring developer configuration.
SuperTokens self-hosted is Apache-2.0 licensed and runs as a service alongside your backend. Your backend uses the SuperTokens SDK to verify tokens, which calls the SuperTokens core service.
Ory — Cloud-Native Microservices
Ory takes an architecture-first approach: each concern (identity, sessions, permissions, OAuth) is a separate service. Ory Kratos handles identity, Ory Hydra handles OAuth 2.0, Ory Keto handles permissions. This modularity suits microservice architectures where you want identity to be a stateless service rather than a monolith.
The trade-off is operational complexity: you're running and maintaining multiple services. Ory is worth the complexity for large teams with dedicated platform engineers, but is over-engineered for most applications.
Full Comparison
| Feature | Keycloak | Authentik | Logto | SuperTokens | Ory |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protocol Support | OIDC, SAML, LDAP | OIDC, SAML, Proxy | OIDC | OIDC | OIDC, OAuth |
| Min RAM | 2 GB | 1 GB | 512 MB | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Language | Java | Python/Go | TypeScript | Java/Node | Go |
| SAML 2.0 | ✅ | ✅ | Roadmap | ❌ | ❌ |
| LDAP Sync | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Proxy Auth | ❌ | ✅ Native | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Multi-Tenant | ✅ (realms) | ✅ | ✅ (orgs) | ✅ | ✅ |
| Pre-built UI | ✅ Themes | ✅ | ✅ Custom | ✅ Components | ❌ |
| Social Login | ✅ 50+ | ✅ | ✅ 30+ | ✅ | ✅ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
Decision Framework
Choose Keycloak if: Enterprise requirements — SAML federation, LDAP sync, fine-grained authorization, or compliance requirements demand a battle-tested IAM platform.
Choose Authentik if: You need to add SSO to existing apps without modifying their code. Also the best choice for protecting internal tools and self-hosted services.
Choose Logto if: You're building a consumer or B2B SaaS and want the best SDK coverage and sign-in UI experience.
Choose SuperTokens if: Your stack is React + Node.js/Python and you want pre-built UI components with correct session security defaults.
Choose Ory if: You're building a microservice architecture and want identity as composable, stateless services.
Cost Comparison
| MAU | Auth0 Annual | Keycloak (self-hosted) | Annual Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1K | $276 | $96/year (VPS) | $180 |
| 10K | $2,760 | $192/year | $2,568 |
| 100K | $27,600 | $384/year | $27,216 |
Auth0's cost scales linearly with users. Self-hosted auth cost scales with infrastructure, which grows much more slowly.
Related: Keycloak vs Authentik: SSO Platform Compared · Authentik vs Logto vs Zitadel · Best Open Source Auth0 Alternatives · How to Self-Host Authentik
See open source alternatives to Auth0 on OSSAlt.